WebUnited States Supreme Court. GAFFNEY v. CUMMINGS(1973) No. 71-1476 Argued: Decided: June 18, 1973 Connecticut's legislative apportionment plan was held by the … WebFeb 2, 2024 · Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735, 15 744-746 & n.10. 16 The Supreme Court has explicitly recognized that population-based 17 redistricting need not precisely equalize voting power. Gaffney observed that even 18 though decennial apportionments are based primarily on census figures, “[t]he 19 proportion of the census population too …
U.S. Reports: Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735 (1973).
WebAppellant Gaffney, the Chairman of the State Republican Party, was permitted to intervene in support of the Board's plan and, after a three-judge court was empaneled, the court heard testimony in March 1972. J. Brian Gaffney was chairman of the state Republican Party and is the named petitioner in this case. Theodore R. Cummings was a long-time Connecticut Democrat, before he died in 2015. Court decision. The Supreme Court's decision was announced on March 18, 1973, and delivered by Justice White. See more Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735 (1973), is a Supreme Court decision upholding statewide legislative apportionment plans for Connecticut. The Court admitted that these plans entailed "substantial … See more For the past fifty years, the two principal guidelines for determining whether a state redistricting plan is fair are: One man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's A State must make … See more • Text of Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735 (1973) is available from: Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio) See more The various states were eligible, and in some cases required, to redraw certain House districts and state assembly districts as a result of the 1970 Census. Connecticut's … See more The Supreme Court's decision was announced on March 18, 1973, and delivered by Justice White. The Connecticut districting system, with mean deviation of 1.9%, was approved. Minor deviations from mathematical equality among … See more • Fourteenth Amendment See more briny colloq
Favors v. Cuomo - Harvard Law Review
WebSee Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735, 751, 754 (1973) (upholding a redistricting plan, acknowledging it was drawn with the intent to achieve a rough approximation of the … WebJul 10, 2000 · Gaffney v. Cummings (1973) " The court upheld a legislative redistricting plan in which the total deviation was 1.81 percent for the Senate and 7.83 percent for the House. This indicates that legislative plans with a total deviation of 10% or less are presumptively constitutional although 10 percent is not a safe harbor." from the NCSL … WebGaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735, 93 S.Ct. 2321, 37 L.Ed.2d 298. A determination that a gerrymander violates the law must rest on something more than the conclusion that political classifications were applied. It must rest instead on a conclusion that the classifications, though generally permissible, were applied in an can you shave after beard transplant